Microsoft Teams-Based Interactive Learning Management Training To Improve Teacher Competence At Mts Nurus Syam, Bondowoso District
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71392/gjsce.v3i1.145Keywords:
Microsoft Teams, Interactive Learning Management, Teacher Competence, Digital Literacy, Teacher TrainingAbstract
This community service activity aims to improve digital literacy and simple graphic design skills through a Canva Workshop for ninth-grade students of MTs Nurur Rahmah, while simultaneously developing participants' abilities in creating creative marketing media based on local economic potential. The activity was implemented using a Service Learning approach that integrates academic learning with community empowerment practices through four stages: preparation, service, reflection, and celebration. Data collection was carried out through observation, interviews, documentation, and pre- and post-tests, then analyzed descriptively qualitatively and supported by simple descriptive quantitative analysis to see changes in participant abilities. The results of the activity showed an increase in digital literacy skills, mastery of Canva features, creativity in producing digital promotional media, and increased self-confidence of participants after participating in the training. This workshop also produced a training module that can be used as a continuous learning medium in schools. The implications of the activity show that the practice-based Service Learning approach is effectively applied to improve students' digital competence while supporting the development of the community's creative economy through the use of simple, applicable, and sustainable graphic design technology.
References
Alkhatib, H., & Alainati, S. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of microsoft teams as a platform for online learning: How to Enhance students’ participation in blended and virtual learning. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 26(6), 26-31.
Biegel, D. E., Farkas, K. J., & Wadsworth, N. (2021). Social service programs for older adults and their families: Service use and barriers. In Services to the Aging and Aged (pp. 141-178). Routledge.
Blundell, C. N. (2021). Teacher use of digital technologies for school-based assessment: A scoping review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(3), 279-300.
Bradley, V. M. (2021). Learning Management System (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68-92.
Callaghan, N. (2021). Understanding the role of technological platforms in schools. Educational Media International, 58(4), 355-373.
Chan, J. R., Marasigan, A. C., & Santander, N. T. (2021). Multigrade teachers’ experiences and learning assessments on modular remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 10(6).
Capone, R., De Caterina, P., & Mazza, G. A. G. (2017). Blended learning, flipped classroom and virtual environment: challenges and opportunities for the 21st century students. Edulearn17 Proceedings, 10478-10482. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.0985
De Caro-Barek, V., Lysne, D. A., Støckert, R., Solbjørg, O. K., & Røren, K. A. F. (2023, October). Dynamic learning spaces—dynamic pedagogy. Students’ voices from a master’s program focusing on student active learning in a cross-institution two-campus organization. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1155374). Frontiers Media SA.
Faisol, M., Hasanah, R., Munawwaroh, I., Putri, D. F., & Qushwa, F. G. (2024). Internalization of Islamic Teaching Values in Forming Students with Siddiq, Amanah Tablig and Fatonah Characters. Journal of Social Studies and Education, 2(2), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.61987/jsse.v2i2.518
Flanagan, B., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2022). Early-warning prediction of student performance and engagement in open book assessment by reading behavior analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00348-4
Fulton, C. (2020). Collaborating in online teaching: inviting e-guests to facilitate learning in the digital environment. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(7-8), 579-585.
Guyatt, G., Zhao, Y., Mayer, M., Briel, M., Mustafa, R., Izcovich, A., ... & Schandelmaier, S. (2023). GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 158, 70-83.
Ismail, S., & Ismail, S. (2021, May). Teaching approach using Microsoft Teams: Case study on satisfaction versus barriers in online learning environment. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1874, No. 1, p. 012020). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012020
Kerssens, N., & Van Dijck, J. (2022). Governed by edtech? Valuing pedagogical autonomy in a platform society. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 284-303.
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
Munawwaroh, I., & Baharun, H. (2022). Analysis of the effectiveness of cloud-based learning management systems (LMS) in university. International Journal of Instructional Technology, 1(2), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.33650/ijit.v1i2.9317
Munawwaroh, I., Qushwa, F. G., Baharun, H., Hefniy, H., & Tohet, M. (2024). Assistance for the furudul ainiyah program to improve the quality of madrasah graduates. Communautaire: Journal of Community Service, 3(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.61987/communautaire.v3i2.459
Mustoip, S., Tabroni, I., Sulaiman, S., & Marliani, L. (2023). Promoting equity and excellence in elementary education: A global approach to school management and leadership. IJOBBA: International Journal of Bunga Bangsa Cirebon, 2(2), 210-217.
Opateye, J., & Ewim, D. R. E. (2021). Assessment for learning and feedback in chemistry: a case for employing information and communication technology tools. International Journal of Research in STEM Education, 3(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v3i2.660
Sefton-Green, J. (2022). Towards platform pedagogies: Why thinking about digital platforms as pedagogic devices might be useful. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 43(6), 899-911.
Singleton, G., & Furber, C. (2024). Verbal feedback for written assessment: evaluating a novel feedback communication strategy. British Journal of Midwifery, 32(11), 584-590.
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2024.0029
Solheim, K., Ertesvåg, S. K., & Dalhaug Berg, G. (2018). How teachers can improve their classroom interaction with students: New findings from teachers themselves. Journal of Educational Change, 19(4), 511-538.
Sudrajat, J., Mayasari, A., & Arifudin, O. (2024). Enhancing the quality of learning through an e-learning-based academic management information system at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 621-632.
Shurygin, V., Berestova, A., Litvinova, T., Kolpak, E., & Nureyeva, A. (2021). Universal models and platforms in e-learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(9), 63-75.
Tai, J. H. M., Bellingham, R., Lang, J., & Dawson, P. (2019). Student perspectives of engagement in learning in contemporary and digital contexts. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(5), 1075-1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1598338
Wanga, M. T., Henryb, D. A., & Degol, J. L. (2020). engagement in learning. Advances in motivation science, 7, 113.
Woodcock, S., & Woolfson, L. M. (2019). Are leaders leading the way with inclusion? Teachers’ perceptions of systemic support and barriers towards inclusion. International Journal of Educational Research, 93, 232-242.
